Hills of Psalm 121

I was at a college graduation recently expecting it to be the normal thing although happy for the students I knew and their joy at finally reaching their goal of finishing their courses. However, as often happens, the Lord arrested my attention with his Word. One of the speakers given the task to bring greetings from an American University, talked about Psalm 121 and what a blessing this psalm had been to him.

He indicated that the question in verse 1, "I will lift up mine eyes unto the hills, from where does my help come?" is best understood as a reflection of the pagan worship that took place on the "high places" as in Jeremiah (3.23, "Surely the [idolatrous] commotion on the hills and mountains is a deception; surely in the LORD our God is the salvation of Israel" http://www.ridgewaymethodist.org.uk/pdf/Psalm121Sermon.pdf).

Other commentators also believe it could relate to Jerusalem or Mt Zion in which case the psalmist is saying as he travels to the holy Mount, as I lift up mine eyes to the hills I remember that beyond these hills is the power of the Lord God the creator.

Both interpretations, however, act as warnings to remind up to keep our eyes on the fact that it is the Lord, the God of Israel, the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has made everything, heaven and earth. Both interpretations warn us of the present danger of substituting idols for the living God; of trusting in a variety of created things to support us when things are tough when in effect only the One "from whom, through whom and to whom are all things", can possibly do that.

Who Among Us Welcomes Change?

I for one don't! And I'm sure if i had been in the temple when Jesus drove the money-changers out of the temple in Jn 2, I imagine I might have resisted strongly the change that his actions presaged. For he was not just upset about the money transactions; his zeal related to his understanding that he had come to bring in a new order of things, a dominant theme throughout the gospel of John.


We grasp this notion when we listen carefully to the discussion
about the temple and his body after his actions above. We see that
this temple in Jerusalem is no longer to be the place of sacrifice but his body is to be the final sacrifice ushering in true worship (Jn 4) through his resurrection.

Waiting in suffering

Our four bible readings for Lent 5 had many themes binding them together but the one that first came to me was waiting in the midst of suffering.

In Ezekiel 37, the valley of dry bones vision, the people of God have been waiting for salvation for 70 years and now the Lord purposes to rebuild the nation. In Psalm 130, the lines 'I wait for the Lord' is announced 'out of the depths'. Romans 8 (vv5-11) contrasts those with their inner hearts captive to the 'flesh', human nature that remains in rebellion to God to those living according to the Spirit. Verse 11 may suggest the present or the future or perhaps both. The Spirit dwelling in the Christian means life now and in the future; but in the now, we wait while the Spirit and the flesh struggle within and cause us to suffer (vv 18-25).

And the gospel is according to St John 11, the raising of Lazarus. We note that first Jesus waits two days more after he hears the news that the man whom he loves is dying!! By the time Jesus gets to Lazarus, he has been buried for four days. Suffering is evident in Martha and Mary who question Jesus about his lack of speed. 'Lord if you had been here . . . . . . !

Have we not said that to God in our depths experience? Lord if you had done something differently! If only you would rearrange the universe to suit me! Lord, you ought to be a god who obeys my bidding!! After all, I give to the church and I even go to church! And now I ask for this one thing, and you deny me.

With all these questions we reveal that we still have a long way to go. Interestingly, two of these passages mention the important thing that needs to be driven deep into our hearts but against which our whole socialisation rebels. We are not the centre of the universe. I am not the centre of the universe. We are not what it's all about!! The whole of creation is not about our glory or aimed at getting glory for man.

It's about God's glory! (Man's glory is a derivative of that glorifying purpose!) In Ezekiel 36 (v32) the text says, 'it is not for your sake that I will act'. In John 11, Lazarus' raising is explicitly said by Jesus to be 'for the glory of God, so that the Son of God may be glorified by means of it' (v 4).

Meanwhile we wait suffering and in our suffering we are changed if we allow God into our suffering. Of course this is hard. Soul-making is hard for us but necessary if we are to be redemptive world-makers.

Anaesthetising ourselves to death

When the Orwellian 1984 arrived, said Neil Postman, people breathed a sigh of relief thinking all is well because we were not oppressed by any 'Big Brother'. But, the earlier prophetic voice of Aldous Huxley had argued in Brave New World (1932) that people would finally choose to be anaesthetised rather than face reality.

And, one of our great modern methods of anaesthetising ourselves against reality is entertainment or in Blaise Pascal's word, diversions. For Pascal, diversions were one way mankind avoids thinking about the reality facing it at death. And the most pervasive entertainment diversion of this age is television. Neil Postman said in Amusing Ourselves to Death (1985),

"It is my object in the rest of this book to make the epistemology of television visible again. I will try to demonstrate by concrete example ... that television's conversations promote incoherence and triviality ... and that television speaks in only one persistent voice — the voice of entertainment. Beyond that, I will try to demonstrate that to enter the great television conversation, one American cultural institution after another is learning to speak its terms. Television, in other words, is transforming our culture into one vast arena for show business. It is entirely possible, of course, that in the end we shall find that delightful, and decide we like it just fine. This is exactly what Aldous Huxley feared was coming, fifty years ago."

I am not against television per se. Rather, I fear that our uncritical watching of the magical screen is gradually by stealth squeezing us into the mold of the world by the spirit of this age and deadening us to the urgent, on-going need to be remolded in our inner lives by the power of the Holy Spirit. Non-Christian prophets warned us that this was coming but we seem to be oblivious to the juggernaut of entertainment.

We get our news through TV, our 'reality' through TV, our politics through TV, our language through TV but fail to take account of the issue that it wouldn't be on the screen if it didn't entertain. Think of all that has had to be edited out to make sure the final presentation entertains and holds our easily divertible attention. And further, don't we realise that our hearts, our inner selves are being shaped by this form of communication?

The other effect is how this addiction to entertainment works in supposedly non-entertainment spheres such as church meetings. Much complaint about these meetings pivots on the sometimes unspoken assumption that such meetings ought to entertain the faithful. I wonder whether we ever stop in our narcissistic ramblings to realise that the church service is not about us. It's a divine service because in the service we serve the divine. It's entertainment for God if one likes but our entertainment is secondary.

I am not arguing for the inherent piety of boring services because boring preachers (and others) are often afflicted with narcissism. They're boring because they won't shut up, listen to God for a change and die to self. That aside, our primary way of judging church should never be, was it entertaining? To do so, is to have fallen captive to the spirit of entertainment that now holds terrible sway over western culture.

Making a redemptive difference

Interesting modern phrase is expressed in the desire 'to make a difference'. Being somewhat skeptical of all catch phrases, I have regarded this one as something akin to human hubris. We put huff and puff into our work imagining that it matters a damn in the total scheme of things. When we really subject our vaunted imaginings to the rule of sober judgement do we imagine that our dust-like temporality makes a difference in a world beset with the problems this world experiences?

And, what type of difference are we talking about? Is it a difference that we imagine will establish an 'immortality project' that will mean we deny death as the lawful end of this mortal life?

I was at a funeral today and realised again how the liturgical tradition to which I belong stemming from the old catholic faith mentions repeatedly the certainty of death for this present life. Yet, modern man does all it can to avoid this unpalatable fact and instead seeks 'to make a difference in this life' because otherwise, what else is there?

Christians unfortunately are caught up by the same spirit. Funerals ought to be attended more because of their rude reminder that 'in the midst of life we are in death': funerals should shock us into living as if this life were a dress rehearsal not the actual play.

The ancients knew this truth whereas we tend to hide from it. Even the Anglican Church of Australia's prayer book of 1995 no longer has a funeral service within it while the 1978 edition of the prayer book did. No doubt various reasons relating to space will be advanced for this omission but it's interesting that it is the funeral service that is deleted.

However, my cynicism about the phrase 'making a difference' is tempered by the fact that I do think that people are in the world to make a difference, a 'redemptive' difference: redemptive gives change some direction and reduces man's tendency to take prideful centre stage. For if we yearn for redemptive change, then it is the Spirit of God yearning together with our spirit that promotes this desire. This understanding cuts down our tendency to elevate ourselves above our station and calling.

Jesus at Jacob's well in Samaria

Many levels are evident in this account. Unfortunately, the story is very often imagined to be just a personal conversion incident. However, much more lies within its lineaments. Too often we focus on the woman. What if we rather look at Jesus, see what he is doing for a change, see what the Father is doing, and understand the significance of what they are doing.

Jesus 'must needs go through Samaria'. A strange statement because most Jews must needs never go through Samaria. If you were a pious Jewish Rabbi, you went the long way around Samaria and avoided going through the accursed place. Samaritans were heretics and accursed! Jesus waits in the heat of the day for a woman, this woman who is going to be bear testimony to his character in the city of Sychar, a ritually unclean place. But, this Rabbi, was concerned always to be doing the will of the One who sent him (v 34).

Jesus asks for a drink, which on the surface of things seems so pedestrian and trivial. However, with St John, every detail is important. The seen and the unseen things are intertwined but it is the unseen (the spiritual, the things of the Spirit) that one must understand in order to comprehend what Jesus is doing.

Jesus innocently asks for water but he quickly moves to distance his request from the water in Jacob's well. The water is Jesus Himself who is the salvation of the world (including accursed Samaritans in Sychar). The woman's attempts to treat him like a crazy Jew who doesn't know the proper manners of the time and embroil him in a Jewish-Samaritan argument gets derailed with Jesus moving from water to truthful worship that eclipses either Samaritan or Jewish worship. He then moves further when she asks about Messiah to reveal himself as that One.

The growing spiritual awakening of this woman prompts her to go and share what she knows with those in the city. A correspondent recently, quoting William Law, said that Christians are those who have died, gone to heaven and returned with good news!! It seemed the case with this woman. She had experienced the true living water with Jesus, the heavenly water, and went off impelled to share what she now had experienced.

Many of the Samaritans came to believe in our Lord as the Saviour of the world firstly because of the testimony of the woman but eventually because of hearing Jesus' own words during the two days he stayed with them. So the Word made flesh 'tabernacles' as the true temple of God with these outcast people bringing Himself as their salvation because God wants all to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth.

Sleeping in busyness

The paradox in the Western business mindset, where so many things, if not everything temporal, is governed by a market mindset, is that the West is asleep in its busyness! William Law (1686-1761) wrote the classic, The spirit of prayer: or, The soul arising out of the vanity of time into the riches of eternity begins with man slumbering in darkness.

[Pryr-1.1-1] The greatest Part of Mankind, nay of Christians, may be said to be asleep; and that particular Way of Life, which takes up each Man's Mind, Thoughts, and Actions, may be very well called his particular Dream. This Degree of Vanity is equally visible in every Form and Order of Life. The Learned and the Ignorant, the Rich and the Poor, are all in the same State of Slumber, only passing away a short Life in a different kind of Dream. But why so? It is because Man has an Eternity within him, is born into this World, not for the Sake of living here, not for any Thing this World can give him, but only to have Time and Place, to become either an eternal Partaker of a Divine Life with God, or to have an hellish Eternity among fallen Angels: And therefore, every Man who has not his Eye, his Heart, and his Hands, continually governed by this twofold Eternity, may justly be said to be fast asleep, to have no awakened Sensibility of Himself. And a Life devoted to the Interests and Enjoyments of this World, spent and wasted in the Slavery of earthly Desires, may be truly called a Dream; as having all the Shortness, Vanity, and Delusion of a Dream; only with this great Difference, that when a Dream is over, nothing is lost but Fictions and Fancies; but when the Dream of Life is ended only by Death, all that Eternity is lost for which we were brought into Being.

Pausing in silence

We are less inclined these days to repress our sexuality-consciousness but wholly given over to repressing our 'God-consciousness' (Viktor Frankl). Not that that is new in our era because mankind has always be active in the wilful suppression of the truth (St Paul). One way we avoid God and the truth of God is by busyness. Carl Jung was held to have said, 'busyness is not of the devil; it is the devil'!

Even in church, congregants keep themselves busy by 'redeeming the time' (!), by doing things that keep their attention diverted from what God might be saying to them at this time. They talk and socialise before the service in such a way that God may be kept out of their conversation.

Churches can be known for rushing through services and denominations once known for the ability to pause during the service, so that people may remember what they are doing, are perhaps doing this less today. We think we will be heard by God for our much talking and noise. We forget that God is interested in teaching us to be present to Him.

Pausing is a vital activity for churches to do. Take time to pause after the sermon, for example. Perhaps, people are thinking, Thank God that's over! Now we can get on to the next thing. But, God is waiting for us to say, Speak Lord for your servant is listening. Few sermons or bible readings do not have the potential for God's present word to us to be conveyed.

The blindnesses we Christians don't see

A good friend of mine recently said to me, 'see your blindness'.

Paradoxical words because how can the blind see? It's like a Zen koan, an insoluble puzzle that forces discursive reason to be silent and stop its incessant chatter. Only the Holy Spirit of Truth can cause us to 'see our blindness' and then heal us.

The third chapter of Jonah revealed a blindness to me: when the people of Nineveh heard that judgement was coming upon their city, they began to amend their lives! They were sorry, yes, but it was a sorrow, borne out of a change in attitude, in heart, which issued in action.

The Reformers, Luther and Calvin, believed that the Christian life began in repentance and was to continue in repentance, a continual renewing of the mind or understanding; not merely an intellectual approval of interesting proposals but a divinely, initiated spiritual work involving the deep heart.

'Be not conformed to this world': I was educated early in Pentecostalism and Brethrenism - a strange mixture - but both emphasised the dangers of conformity to the world. Of course, my early education was about girls not wearing lipstick, young people going to dances and the cinema, drinking alcohol, coarse language and playing cards.

A Pentecostal preacher once shattered my easy complacency about standards by sharing that Pentecostals throughout the world had wildly divergent ideas about 'worldliness'. He joked that in one place in the deep south of the U.S. when he asked for a cup of coffee, he was told, "Coffee, coffee, down here we don't even drink whiskey!" What the preacher explained was that we always have to be aware of worldliness but we also have to be aware that the 'world' changes and that 'worldliness' in one generation or in one country may not be 'worldliness' in another. Some preaching about 'worldliness' is close to stupidity.

The Church at many levels has now become openly conformable to the present age. This situation is not because church members wear lipstick, dance, go to the pictures or say 'bloody'.

We must ask God to show us our blindness, our willingness to compromise with the spirit of the age so that our lives are little different from those outside the church. Our virtual atheism as defined by John Wesley, where we can consider anything as outside the superintendence of almighty God, is our biggest compromise with the world. Too many swallow camels but choke on gnats!